{"id":18525,"date":"2013-03-02T08:23:40","date_gmt":"2013-03-02T06:23:40","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.myza.co.za\/nersa-announces-8-tariff-increase-for-eskom\/"},"modified":"2013-03-02T08:23:40","modified_gmt":"2013-03-02T06:23:40","slug":"nersa-announces-8-tariff-increase-for-eskom","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.myza.co.za\/press\/nersa-announces-8-tariff-increase-for-eskom\/","title":{"rendered":"Nersa announces 8% tariff increase for Eskom"},"content":{"rendered":"

\t\t\t<\/p>\n

The National Energy Regulator of SA (Nersa) made known its decision to grant an 8% increase on Eskom\u2019s request for a 16% tariff increase today.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe decision of the energy regulator is based on facts,\u201d said Nersa chairperson Cecilia Khuzwayo.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe third multi-year price determination will be 8% over the next five years.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cThe average electricity price will increase to 65.51 cents per kWh in 2013\/14 up to 89.13 cents in 2018,\u201d said Cecilia Khuzwayo, chairperson of Nersa, on Thursday.<\/p>\n

Eskom had applied for a 16% increase in electricity prices in each of the next five years. This was more than double the current price, taking it from 61 cents per kWh in 2012\/13, to 128 cents per kWh in 2017\/18.<\/p>\n

Nersa said that the total five-year revenue approved amounted R906 553 million.<\/p>\n

The decision comes on the heels of the current MYPD 2\u2019s coming to an end in March 2013.<\/p>\n

Last October, Eskom asked the regulator for a total 16% tariff increase over the next five years. The utility is asking the regulator for 13% for each of the five years for its own needs, plus 3% to support the introduction of Independent Power Producers (IPPs) which are expected to contribute 2% to the country\u2019s energy grid.<\/p>\n

At a Gauteng public hearing held last month, the power utility\u2019s chief executive officer Brian Dames said that a stable supply of energy is crucial to power South Africa\u2019s economic growth going into the future. Public hearings into the request were held nationwide.<\/p>\n

Dames said that the request covered the cost of supplying power, investing in the future and financing new capacity.<\/p>\n

Dames said Eskom was cognisant of the impact of its request, but that current electricity prices did not cover the full costs of producing electricity. The poor have also been considered under Eskom\u2019s application, he said.<\/p>\n

The tariff increase was necessary to maintain revenue as well as to cover operating costs and the financial stability of Eskom. The tariff Eskom was asking for, said Dames, should meet the requirements of both industry and consumers.<\/p>\n

The proposed increase represented a total price increase from the current 61 cents per kilowatt hour in 2012\/13 to 128 cents per kilowatt hour in 2017\/18.<\/p>\n

In November, Public Enterprises Minister Malusi Gigaba said the tariff increase was a necessity.<\/p>\n

Gigaba said at the time although the power parastatal wished it could have kept its request to a single-digit figure, the double-digit tariff hike request was necessitated by the tough conditions prevailing in the economy.<\/p>\n

Welcoming the news, Kevin Hustler, CEO of the Nelson Mandela Bay Business Chamber said; \u201cThe Nelson Mandela Bay Business Chamber is grateful that the National Energy Regulator of South Africa (NERSA) has taken cognisance\u00a0 of the combined voice of business, labour and civil society stating clearly in unison that the tariffs proposed by Eskom were unacceptable. The proposed tariffs were uncompetitive and unsustainable for our country as a whole, and they would have stifled economic growth and development into the future. We thank the commissioners at NERSA for listening and interacting with presenters at the regional hearings, and for being prepared to take into account suggestions and proposed solutions put forward for consideration.<\/p>\n

\u201cThis outcome demonstrates the value of the collective voice of business, as the Business Chamber represents its members. The Chamber played a strong and steadfast role in presenting its position through the appropriate NERSA processes, and has been heard on all hearing platforms granted through the public hearing process. The Nelson Mandela Bay Business Chamber is proud of the efforts of its Strategic Resources Task Team, under the leadership of Mr Angus Clark, and supported by Mr David Mertens, MD of Autocast, as well as their respective teams that have supported and built the business case for our rejection of Eskom\u2019s proposed five year tariff increase.\u201d<\/p>\n

IFP Spokesman on Public Enterprises, Mario GR Oriani-Ambrosini, MP said this about the increase; \u201cFor years I have denounced the entire process of financing Eskom\u2019s build program through tariff increases is a fraud on us all. NERSA was established to determine tariff increases on the basis of changed operational costs and market conditions, not to finance capital cost and expansion. It is not equipped to do so and forge alternatives to the build program. It is bound to go with the flow of events created by Eskom. It is good that on this occasion it resisted Eskom\u2019s outrageous requests, but this is part of a charade in which in all likelihood Eskom already discounted in its request the possibility that Nersa would half it.<\/p>\n

\u201cEskom will undoubtedly lament this decision merely to make it more credible. The reality is that tariff increases are indirect regressive taxes which are killing our ecumenic growth and family savings alike, impoverishing the whole of our society. The build program should have been financed either with an international tender which would have attracted needed foreign investments or through the State budget so that its costs could be more equitably distributed and absorbed over a longer period.\u201d<\/p>\n

Twitteractions:<\/strong><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Can the Freedom Charter wake up and save us from Nersa and his nephew Eskom\u2014\u2014everything is up except our pockets!!! Eish!!!<\/span>
\n28 February 2013 2:25 pm<\/a> via Facebook<\/a><\/em>Reply<\/strong><\/span><\/a><\/em>Retweet<\/strong><\/span><\/a><\/em>Favorite<\/strong><\/span><\/a>
\n<\/a><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

One wonders how much Pravin Gordhan\u2019s budget speech influenced Nersa\u2019s decision of 8% electricity hike for #Eskom<\/a><\/span>
\n28 February 2013 2:34 pm<\/a> via Mobile Web (M2)<\/a><\/em>Reply<\/strong><\/span><\/a><\/em>Retweet<\/strong><\/span><\/a><\/em>Favorite<\/strong><\/span><\/a>
\n<\/a><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

More load shedding for us!:(RT @SABCNewsOnline<\/a>: Eskom gets 8% hike http:\/\/t.co\/do4OWeP24o<\/a><\/span>
\n28 February 2013 2:34 pm<\/a> via UberSocial for BlackBerry<\/a><\/em>Reply<\/strong><\/span><\/a><\/em>Retweet<\/strong><\/span><\/a><\/em>Favorite<\/strong><\/span><\/a>
\n<\/a><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Eskom RT @S_dotontop<\/a>: Who? RT @Lady__Vee<\/a>: 16% every year was just too much, taking advantage of being monopoly???<\/span>
\n28 February 2013 2:34 pm<\/a> via Twitter for Android<\/a><\/em>Reply<\/strong><\/span><\/a><\/em>Retweet<\/strong><\/span><\/a><\/em>Favorite<\/strong><\/span><\/a>
\n<\/a><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

So Eskom only got half of what they wanted. Thank you Nersa.<\/span>
\n28 February 2013 2:36 pm<\/a> via Twitter for iPad<\/a><\/em>Reply<\/strong><\/span><\/a><\/em>Retweet<\/strong><\/span><\/a><\/em>Favorite<\/strong><\/span><\/a>
\n<\/a><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Quite a relief! Nersa cuts Eskom\u2019s greed by half. No more fat bonuses for the next 5 years. Oops! #MinisterGigaba<\/a> will give them more $ shm<\/span>
\n28 February 2013 2:36 pm<\/a> via Twitter for BlackBerry\u00ae<\/a><\/em>Reply<\/strong><\/span><\/a><\/em>Retweet<\/strong><\/span><\/a><\/em>Favorite<\/strong><\/span><\/a>
\n<\/a><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Thank u Nersa! 8% is indeed enough for Eskom<\/span>
\n28 February 2013 2:37 pm<\/a> via Twitter for BlackBerry\u00ae<\/a><\/em>Reply<\/strong><\/span><\/a><\/em>Retweet<\/strong><\/span><\/a><\/em>Favorite<\/strong><\/span><\/a>
\n<\/a><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Good news for consumers, Eskom only gets 8% although they asked for 16% originally. They must be livid. Watch the load shedding start<\/span>
\n28 February 2013 2:43 pm<\/a> via Twitter for iPad<\/a><\/em>Reply<\/strong><\/span><\/a><\/em>Retweet<\/strong><\/span><\/a><\/em>Favorite<\/strong><\/span><\/a>
\n<\/a><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

It seems government and eskom work well together in screwing up this country!<\/span>
\n28 February 2013 2:42 pm<\/a> via Twitter for iPhone<\/a><\/em>Reply<\/strong><\/span><\/a><\/em>Retweet<\/strong><\/span><\/a><\/em>Favorite<\/strong><\/span><\/a>
\n<\/a><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Is that enough for their bonuses and family days? RT @News24<\/a>: Nersa: 8% hike enough for Eskom http:\/\/t.co\/TZCSJNsrQY<\/a><\/span>
\n28 February 2013 2:38 pm<\/a> via Twitter for iPad<\/a><\/em>Reply<\/strong><\/span><\/a><\/em>Retweet<\/strong><\/span><\/a><\/em>Favorite<\/strong><\/span><\/a>
\n<\/a><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Money lost through useless expenditure by state enterprises could have fund Eskom\u2019s supply capacity expansion. Now we carry the burden.<\/span>
\n28 February 2013 2:46 pm<\/a> via Twitter for BlackBerry\u00ae<\/a><\/em>Reply<\/strong><\/span><\/a><\/em>Retweet<\/strong><\/span><\/a><\/em>Favorite<\/strong><\/span><\/a>
\n<\/a><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

RT @TheMercurySA<\/a> inflation is at 5.4%. Why was Eskom given above the inflation? Squeezing even the last cent out \u2026 http:\/\/t.co\/T7BTuJhWp4<\/a><\/span>
\n28 February 2013 2:54 pm<\/a> via UberSocial for BlackBerry<\/a><\/em>Reply<\/strong><\/span><\/a><\/em>Retweet<\/strong><\/span><\/a><\/em>Favorite<\/strong><\/span><\/a>
\n<\/a><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

@Zwelinzima1<\/a> ESKOM Knew all along they wanted 8% so they doubled the figure to land an 8%increase stil too high for SA citizens<\/span>
\n28 February 2013 2:56 pm<\/a> via Twitter for BlackBerry\u00ae<\/a><\/em>Reply<\/strong><\/span><\/a><\/em>Retweet<\/strong><\/span><\/a><\/em>Favorite<\/strong><\/span><\/a>
\n<\/a><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Eskom will get about 40 % in five years , which 8 percent very year, imagine what municipalities will get a year #Nersa<\/a>, this is wrong<\/span>
\n28 February 2013 2:54 pm<\/a> via web<\/em>Reply<\/strong><\/span><\/a><\/em>Retweet<\/strong><\/span><\/a><\/em>Favorite<\/strong><\/span><\/a>
\n<\/a><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

@Jacanews<\/a> Mark my words #NERSA<\/a> within days there will be a supply capacity crises with everybody being threatened with blackouts from #ESKOM<\/a><\/span>
\n28 February 2013 2:54 pm<\/a> via web<\/em>Reply<\/strong><\/span><\/a><\/em>Retweet<\/strong><\/span><\/a><\/em>Favorite<\/strong><\/span><\/a>
\n<\/a><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Nersa says 8% hike for Eskom, not 16%; and, relieved, we all go \u2018yay!\u2019 What for? What was YOUR salary increase last year, if any?<\/span>
\n28 February 2013 3:00 pm<\/a> via HootSuite<\/a><\/em>Reply<\/strong><\/span><\/a><\/em>Retweet<\/strong><\/span><\/a><\/em>Favorite<\/strong><\/span><\/a>
\n<\/a><\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\t\t<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The National Energy Regulator of SA (Nersa) made known its decision to grant an 8% increase on Eskom\u2019s request for a 16% tariff increase today. \u201cThe decision of the energy regulator is based on facts,\u201d said Nersa chairperson Cecilia Khuzwayo. \u201cThe third multi-year price determination will be 8% over the next five years.\u201d \u201cThe average […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","ngg_post_thumbnail":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[1],"tags":[1289,5],"class_list":{"0":"post-18525","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-south-africa","7":"tag-mype","8":"tag-port-elizabeth-2","9":"entry"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myza.co.za\/press\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18525","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myza.co.za\/press\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myza.co.za\/press\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myza.co.za\/press\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myza.co.za\/press\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=18525"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.myza.co.za\/press\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/18525\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myza.co.za\/press\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=18525"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myza.co.za\/press\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=18525"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myza.co.za\/press\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=18525"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}