{"id":188064,"date":"2021-05-05T17:50:18","date_gmt":"2021-05-05T15:50:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.myza.co.za\/in-rwanda-genocide-commemorations-are-infused-with-political-and-diplomatic-agendas\/"},"modified":"2021-05-05T17:50:18","modified_gmt":"2021-05-05T15:50:18","slug":"in-rwanda-genocide-commemorations-are-infused-with-political-and-diplomatic-agendas","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.myza.co.za\/press\/in-rwanda-genocide-commemorations-are-infused-with-political-and-diplomatic-agendas\/","title":{"rendered":"In Rwanda, genocide commemorations are infused with political and diplomatic agendas"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Created in 2003, the <a href=\"https:\/\/cnlg.gov.rw\/index.php?id=2&amp;L=20\">National Commission for the Fight Against Genocide<\/a> is responsible for Rwanda\u2019s genocide remembrance policy. It is a programme that has, over time, influenced all aspects of politics across all sectors.<\/p>\n<p>Each year, on 7 April, themed memorial events are organised by the commission, in close collaboration with the president. <\/p>\n<p>This article addresses the period following the 20th anniversary of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/topic\/Rwandan-Civil-War\">Rwandan Civil War<\/a> and its <a href=\"https:\/\/www.britannica.com\/event\/Rwanda-genocide-of-1994\">1994 genocide<\/a>. <\/p>\n<p>What follows is a review of the commemorations from 2014 to the present \u2013 and a view on the challenges ahead.<\/p>\n<h2>2014 &#8211; 2019: internationalising the remembrance<\/h2>\n<p>In 2014 Rwanda entered the final phase of its genocide remembrance public policy, the \u201csecond internationalisation\u201d phase. The aim was to urge recognition and commemoration of the Rwandan genocide as an ethical obligation across the world.<\/p>\n<p>This gave rise to commemorations in Kigali in 2014 that were considered particularly offensive, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.rfi.fr\/en\/africa\/20140406-france-boycott-rwanda-genocide-commemoration\">especially by the French government<\/a>. On the morning of the event, the French ambassador\u2019s accreditation was withdrawn. The day culminated in an <a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=S9otQUZtd3Y\">accusatory speech<\/a> by Rwandan president Paul Kagame at a ceremony attended by the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.un.org\/sg\/en\/content\/sg\/statement\/2014-04-07\/remarks-commemoration-20th-anniversary-rwandan-genocide-english-and\">UN Secretary General<\/a> and foreign heads of state.<\/p>\n<p>With widespread international genocide commemorations in 2017, Rwanda submitted a draft <a href=\"https:\/\/documents-dds-ny.un.org\/doc\/UNDOC\/LTD\/N17\/439\/57\/PDF\/N1743957.pdf\">resolution<\/a> to the United Nations General Assembly to rename the day. On 26 January 2018, the assembly adopted a decision \u2013 without vote \u2013 for the \u201cInternational Day of Reflection on the 1994 Genocide in Rwanda\u201d to become the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.un.org\/press\/en\/2018\/ga12000.doc.htm\">\u201cInternational Day of Reflection on the 1994 Genocide against the Tutsi in Rwanda\u201d<\/a>. This decision was highly criticised, given the new name excludes victims from other ethnic groups.<\/p>\n<p>In 2019, the 25th anniversary commemorations consecrated the international community\u2019s recognition of its responsibility towards the genocide and unwillingness to try to stop it. Official ceremonies were characterised by remorse from many countries.<\/p>\n<p>Even France, usually in the crosshairs, was spared. A few months prior, a French court had <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theafricareport.com\/32489\/rwanda-genocide-paris-drops-investigation-into-attack-of-plane-carrying-habyarimana\/\">dismissed<\/a> a case against prominent Rwandans for the 6 April 1994 attack on Rwandan president Juvenal Habyarimana\u2019s plane. This sparked the genocide. <\/p>\n<p>A long-running dispute between France and the new Rwandan regime was resolved. But even as the investigation was being closed in 2017, Rwanda enlisted a prestigious US law firm to explore bringing France before international courts for complicity in genocide.<\/p>\n<p>In a 2019 declaration, French president Emmanuel Macron highlighted his desire to \u201cbreak with the way in which France had understood and taught the Tutsi genocide\u201d. He made 7 April a French national <a href=\"https:\/\/www2.assemblee-nationale.fr\/questions\/detail\/15\/QE\/28557\">day of commemoration<\/a> and a commission was <a href=\"https:\/\/www.dw.com\/en\/macron-orders-probe-into-frances-role-in-rwanda-genocide\/a-48227839\">set up<\/a> \u201cto examine all French archives relating to Rwanda between 1990 and 1994\u201d. A French court also dismissed a case against French officers involved in <a href=\"https:\/\/www.realcleardefense.com\/articles\/2018\/05\/14\/assessment_of_opration_turquoise_113440.html\">Operation Turquoise<\/a> in Rwanda. <\/p>\n<p>This indicated an educational approach towards French sovereign institutions, who were invited to recognise the \u201cerrors\u201d of the past. <\/p>\n<h2>2020: the return of controversial commemorations<\/h2>\n<p>The 2020 anniversary was particularly complicated for Rwanda. On top of COVID-19 restrictions and on the eve of commemorations, the UN secretary general Ant\u00f3nio Guterres and UN General Assembly president Volkan Bozkir unexpectedly questioned the new title. <\/p>\n<p>Guterres <a href=\"https:\/\/www.un.org\/en\/preventgenocide\/rwanda\/commemorations-2020-sg-message.shtml\">specified<\/a> that among the one million people murdered in the genocide, \u201cthe victims were overwhelmingly Tutsi, but also included Hutu and others who opposed the genocide\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>The following day, 7 April, Kagame\u2019s <a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/-8WZlmZ_pUY\">short public declaration<\/a> took note of the statements. It was addressed to \u201call Rwandans\u201d, speaking of \u201cwhat happened to our country and what we learned\u201d. It didn\u2019t specifically mention the \u201cgenocide against the Tutsi\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>Such a transgression of the official wording drew such criticism from survivor organisations that Kagame eventually backtracked.<\/p>\n<figure> <span class=\"embed-youtube\" style=\"text-align:center; display: block;\"><iframe loading=\"lazy\" class=\"youtube-player\" width=\"440\" height=\"260\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/-8WZlmZ_pUY?version=3&#038;rel=1&#038;showsearch=0&#038;showinfo=1&#038;iv_load_policy=1&#038;fs=1&#038;hl=en-US&#038;autohide=2&#038;start=45&#038;wmode=transparent\" allowfullscreen=\"true\" style=\"border:0;\" sandbox=\"allow-scripts allow-same-origin allow-popups allow-presentation allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox\"><\/iframe><\/span><figcaption><span class=\"caption\">President Kagame\u2019s 7 April address in 2020.<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Rwanda\u2019s draft resolution required a formal vote to be passed in the UN General Assembly. During debates, the <a href=\"https:\/\/d2v9ipibika81v.cloudfront.net\/uploads\/sites\/296\/4.20.2020-Letter-to-GA-President.pdf\">US<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.un.org\/pga\/74\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/99\/2020\/04\/UK-EOP-on-Rwandan-genocide-resolution-20-April.pdf\">UK<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/usun.usmission.gov\/explanation-of-position-on-the-un-general-assembly-resolution-on-the-rwandan-genocide\/\">denounced<\/a> the rewriting of history implied by this wording. Following Rwandan pressure, the <a href=\"https:\/\/documents-dds-ny.un.org\/doc\/UNDOC\/GEN\/N20\/101\/35\/PDF\/N2010135.pdf?OpenElement\">resolution<\/a> was nevertheless passed.<\/p>\n<p>Rwanda <a href=\"https:\/\/www.undocs.org\/en\/A\/74\/830\">lamented<\/a> the US and UK positions, saying they \u201cbring ambiguity that feeds the resurgent genocide denial movement\u201d in the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.accord.org.za\/conflict-trends\/conflict-great-lakes-region\/\">Great Lakes Region<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>All objectives of the active commemoration policy promoted by the National Commission for the Fight Against Genocide have therefore been formally achieved. The \u201cgenocide against the Tutsi in Rwanda\u201d is now recognised and commemorated internationally as an ethical obligation. So is the genocide remembrance policy, now divorced from its historical context.<\/p>\n<p>By dissociating the genocide from actions undertaken by the two politico-military blocs during the 1990\u201394 war, Rwanda\u2019s official version has ended the debates that characterise the historical work relating to this region since independence. <\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s no longer a matter of rebuilding, using factual <a href=\"https:\/\/www.tandfonline.com\/doi\/full\/10.1080\/14623528.2019.1709611\">research<\/a> to provide depth. It is about criminalising those who dare to disagree, citing various genocide denial laws.<\/p>\n<h2>2021: Rwanda\u2019s other fights<\/h2>\n<p>In 2021, two major events provided the backdrop to commemorations. On 26 March, a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.vie-publique.fr\/sites\/default\/files\/rapport\/pdf\/279186_0.pdf\">report<\/a> on French archives relating to the genocide was <a href=\"https:\/\/www.france24.com\/en\/europe\/20210326-france-braces-for-historians-report-over-rwanda-genocide-failings\">published<\/a>. It was followed by the announcement that Macron would likely travel to Rwanda. In Kigali, everything pointed towards the commemorations capitalising on these advances.<\/p>\n<p>They were indeed capitalised on, but Kagame\u2019s long <a href=\"https:\/\/www.newtimes.co.rw\/news\/kwibuka27-address-president-paul-kagame\">speech<\/a> consisted mainly of justifying the authorities\u2019 resolutions. He denounced countries that have not tried genocidal perpetrators living on their soil and refused to extradite them to Rwanda. \u201cIt\u2019s the same people who question the use of \u2018Genocide against Tutsi\u2019,\u201d he said. \u201cBut the problem of definitions started way back in 1994, of just simply naming what it was.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The accusations are surprising, given that Kigali is preparing to host a <a href=\"https:\/\/thecommonwealth.org\/chogm\">meeting of the Commonwealth<\/a> in June. Rwanda\u2019s membership goes beyond the fact that part of the population speaks English. It\u2019s mainly based on adhering to the Commonwealth Charter values, including human rights.<\/p>\n<p>Rwanda\u2019s human rights violations have been denounced by major Anglo-Saxon human rights organisations <a href=\"https:\/\/www.hrw.org\/world-report\/2021\">Human Rights Watch<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.amnesty.org\/en\/documents\/pol10\/3202\/2021\/en\/\">Amnesty International<\/a>. In rebuttal, Kagame has quoted the French archive report, that then French president Fran\u00e7ois Mitterrand \u201cknew that a genocide against Tutsi was being planned by their allies in Rwanda\u201d. The French report in fact provides strong critique of France\u2019s role supporting the Habyarimana regime between 1990 and 1994, but stops short of stating France was complicit in the genocide.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"align-center zoomable\"> <a href=\"https:\/\/images.theconversation.com\/files\/398961\/original\/file-20210505-21-1six2do.jpg?ixlib=rb-1.1.0&amp;q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=1000&amp;fit=clip\"><img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"A crowd of people in the dark, lit by candles that they hold.\" src=\"http:\/\/www.myza.co.za\/press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/in-rwanda-genocide-commemorations-are-infused-with-political-and-diplomatic-agendas.jpg\"><\/a><figcaption> <span class=\"caption\">AKigali vigil during the 25th commemoration of the genocide.<\/span> <span class=\"attribution\"><span class=\"source\">ASUYOSHI CHIBA\/AFP via Getty Images<\/span><\/span> <\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>But the most important part was yet to come. On 19 April, Rwandan authorities finally revealed their own \u201cinvestigative <a href=\"https:\/\/www.aljazeera.com\/news\/2021\/4\/19\/france-enabled-1994-rwanda-genocide-report-says\">report<\/a>\u201d on France\u2019s role in the genocide. This was updated in light of the French report\u2019s conclusions, but was much harsher. According to Rwanda\u2019s foreign affairs minister, French political leaders \u201cenabled a foreseeable genocide\u201d. <\/p>\n<p>The report states France did not participate in the genocide and \u201cthe French government is not complicit. But it\u2019s a question of law and the Rwandan government will not bring this question before a court.\u201d In this way, the foundations for a \u201chealthy relationship\u201d have been laid, contingent on an official apology, which \u201cwould be a step in the right direction to rebuild trust\u201d.<\/p>\n<h2>2022: challenges ahead<\/h2>\n<p>It seems next year\u2019s commemorations will involve a wealth of events. It\u2019s worth mentioning two other international commemorations concerning Rwanda in 2022. The first will be held on 1 July, the anniversary shared by \u201cwarring brothers\u201d Rwanda and Burundi, celebrating 60 years of independence.<\/p>\n<p>In Rwanda, 1 July is just a bank holiday and the regime will probably continue to mainly celebrate 4 July, the date that they took Kigali in 1994. In Burundi, it\u2019s the opposite. Authorities intend to give strong meaning to 1 July, remembering both independence and the 50th anniversary of the genocide against the Hutu in 1972. Giving recognition to this <a href=\"https:\/\/www.sciencespo.fr\/mass-violence-war-massacre-resistance\/en\/document\/burundi-killings-1972.html\">\u201chidden\u201d genocide<\/a> will be at the heart of commemorations.<\/p>\n<p>The various massacres and genocides in 1959\u201361, 1965, 1969, 1972, 1988, 1973, 1993\u201394 and 2015 remain profoundly fixed in the memories of both <a href=\"https:\/\/theconversation.com\/burundi-and-rwanda-a-rivalry-that-lies-at-the-heart-of-great-lakes-crises-63795\">Burundians and Rwandans<\/a>. The \u201cTutsi\u201d domination of Burundi and \u201cHutu\u201d domination of Rwanda (now reversed after two civil wars) have established the political authoritarianism of the military regimes. The debate sparked about commemorating one group of victims over the other will endure in various forms.<\/p>\n<p>For the vast majority of Burundians, 50 years after the 1972 genocide and a return to peace, it is high time to honour the memory of all victims of national divisions. Debates established by Burundi\u2019s Truth and Reconciliation Commission alongside the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.africanews.com\/2021\/03\/20\/burundi-s-truth-and-reconcilliation-commission-presents-new-findings\/\/\">current work<\/a> of exhuming and registering genocide victims, have allowed for liberating moments of expression for Hutu and Tutsi populations. <\/p>\n<p>This could finally pave the way for the writing of a plural, shared, national history.<\/p>\n<p> <a href=\"https:\/\/theconversation.com\/africa\/\">Source: The Conversation<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Created in 2003, the National Commission for the Fight Against Genocide is responsible for Rwanda\u2019s genocide remembrance policy. It is a programme that has, over time, influenced all aspects of politics across all sectors. Each year, on 7 April, themed memorial events are organised by the commission, in close collaboration with the president. This article [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":188065,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","ngg_post_thumbnail":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[4584],"tags":[3257],"class_list":{"0":"post-188064","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-africa-news-2","8":"tag-mypr","9":"entry"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.myza.co.za\/press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/05\/in-rwanda-genocide-commemorations-are-infused-with-political-and-diplomatic-agendas.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myza.co.za\/press\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/188064","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myza.co.za\/press\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myza.co.za\/press\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myza.co.za\/press\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myza.co.za\/press\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=188064"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.myza.co.za\/press\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/188064\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myza.co.za\/press\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/188065"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myza.co.za\/press\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=188064"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myza.co.za\/press\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=188064"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myza.co.za\/press\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=188064"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}