{"id":227133,"date":"2022-05-26T00:36:17","date_gmt":"2022-05-25T22:36:17","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.groundup.org.za\/article\/why-independent-healthcare-inside-prisons-vital\/"},"modified":"2022-05-26T00:36:17","modified_gmt":"2022-05-25T22:36:17","slug":"why-independent-healthcare-inside-prisons-is-vital","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.myza.co.za\/press\/why-independent-healthcare-inside-prisons-is-vital\/","title":{"rendered":"Why independent healthcare inside prisons is vital"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

<\/a><\/p>\n

Healthcare professionals working in prisons should be shifted to the Department of Health, writes Judge Edwin Cameron, Inspecting Judge of Correctional Services. Graphic: Lisa Nelson<\/p>\n

Our country\u2019s healthcare system is a cumbersome double-decker<\/a> bus: on top are those of us who have access of some kind to private healthcare (a high estimate is around 27% of the population). The great majority of necessity rely on public healthcare<\/a>. But, within public healthcare, there is a further divide, an overlooked layer at the very lowermost \u2013 the healthcare afforded to people in prison.<\/p>\n

During apartheid, healthcare for those inside prison and in police custody was used as a \u201ctool of manipulation and coercion\u201d<\/a>. There was medical negligence, poor quality care, false medical and autopsy reports, and warped medical ethics. (Bram Fischer, in his dying days, received no treatment for his crippling cancer).<\/p>\n

Some doctors and other medics were complicit in abuses, turning a blind eye to what was happening before them.<\/p>\n

The Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) Special Hearings on Prisons showed how basic access to medical treatment was used to punish. Henry Magkothi<\/a> recounted how difficult it was to gain access on Robben Island to the hospital. \u201cThe doctor didn\u2019t come often enough and even then there were so many obstacles they placed in your way.\u201d<\/p>\n

The problem was not only one of medical ethics. There was a \u201cfragmented approach and a general lack of clarity\u201d in governing what health professionals did to those in their custodial care, wrote Laurel Baldwin-Ragaven, Leslie London and Jeanelle De Gruchy in their book An Ambulance of the Wrong Colour: Health Professionals, Human Rights and Ethics in South Africa<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Not only did doctors have to have security clearance to work in prisons, but there were split institutional loyalties. Some health professionals were employed by the Department of Health and others by the Department of Prisons (now the Department of Correctional Services \u2014 DCS). This led to a dilemma of \u201cdual obligations\u201d<\/a>, where the lines of authority for healthcare and custodial care were blurred. Health professionals owed loyalty to their patients (the inmates). But they had obligations to, and pressure from, their employers (the prison authorities).<\/p>\n

Healthcare must be separated from prison administration<\/h2>\n

This blighted history led Dr Judith van Heerden, an expert in this area, to recommend<\/a> to the TRC that prison healthcare \u201cmust be separated completely from custodial care\u201d. All healthcare professionals in prisons \u201cshould be appointed, paid and responsible to the Department of Health\u201d \u2013 and no longer to the prison authorities.<\/p>\n

The TRC embraced this sound advice in its recommendations. It suggested <\/a>that: the Department of Health should assume control over prison healthcare; prison health responsibilities and obligations should be clearly defined with an independent line of authority.<\/p>\n

These recommendations accord with international guidelines. The UN Mandela Rules<\/a> entail a demarcation between healthcare and custodial care; there shall be \u201cfull clinical independence\u201d. Healthcare professionals \u201cshall not have any role in the imposition of disciplinary sanctions or other restrictive measures\u201d. And clinical decisions may only be taken by healthcare professionals \u201cand may not be overruled or ignored by non-medical prison staff\u201d.<\/p>\n

Experts<\/a> have underscored the importance of providing health services in prison that are separate from the prison administration. The World Health Organisation and the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime note<\/a> that healthcare professionals should act \u201ccompletely independent of prison authorities\u201d and in \u201calignment with public health services.\u201d<\/p>\n

Furthermore, the Association for the Prevention of Torture advocates<\/a> for the \u201cintegration of the prison health service into the national health service\u201d to guard the \u201cprofessional and ethical independence of the health staff\u201d and \u201cprovide recourse to an independent body in case of conflicts.\u201d<\/p>\n

Did democratic South Africa heed this advice? No.<\/p>\n

Medical ethicist Professor Solomon Benatar observes<\/a> that the Department of Health \u201cbegan to dismantle the District Surgeon Services\u201d and \u201c[i]t became possible for DCS to appoint nurses and other medical staff to deliver healthcare\u201d in our prisons.<\/p>\n

This is evident in the plain wording of the Correctional Services Act of 1998. Section 12(1) states that DCS \u201cmust provide, within its available resources, adequate health care services\u201d and section 12(2)(b) outlines that medical treatment \u201cmust be provided by a correctional medical practitioner, medical practitioners or by a specialist or health care institution or person or institution identified by such correctional medical practitioner\u201d. And according to section 12(3), if an inmate opts to be \u201cvisited and examined by a medical practitioner of [their] choice\u201d it is \u201csubject to the permission of the Head of Centre\u201d.<\/p>\n

Post-apartheid, healthcare in prisons is still not independent. Benatar slates this \u201cretrogressive step\u201d; \u201cdiverting some responsibilities for healthcare away from the Department of Health\u201d and towards DCS, diminishes the \u201cloyalty of some health professionals\u201d as it ranks \u201callegiance to prison authorities higher than professional responsibility to patients.\u201d<\/p>\n

A special duty of care<\/h2>\n

In his book Health and Health Promotion in Prisons<\/a>, Professor Michael Ross states<\/a> that depriving inmates of liberty does not mean we may deprive them of access to healthcare. On the contrary, their deprivation of liberty means we owe them a \u201cspecial duty of care\u201d. Critically, Ross acknowledges that we provide \u201cgood care to bad people because we are professional, and because we, and they, are human\u201d and if bad care is given \u201cthe humanity we degrade is also ours, not only theirs\u201d.<\/p>\n

Those in prison should have the same quality of healthcare as the public outside. This is the \u201cequivalence of care\u201d principle. It means that you don\u2019t add poor healthcare treatment on top of imprisonment to punish. As I have written<\/a> before, \u201cprison health affects our health\u201d and \u201cequivalence of care\u201d should be considered a minimum threshold. In light of the higher mortality rates in prisons; government may have to provide higher standards of healthcare in prisons.<\/p>\n

We know that injuries and the use of anti-depressants are warning signs of trouble. Many cases of claimed abuse (especially sexual violations, assaults, use of force and torture) are reported to nurses and doctors. Later, investigators, both internal and external, rely on medical reports. Ross emphasises that one must ensure health assessments of inmates are based on medical criteria and inmates ought to trust their healthcare providers and feel safe to report and speak out about abuse.<\/p>\n

In addition, nurses, psychologists and other medical practitioners play a role in how prisons are run. For example, they are expected to visit inmates in segregation (sometimes in solitary confinement<\/a>). The Act provides that segregation \u201cmust be discontinued\u201d if medical practitioners determine that \u201cit poses a threat to the health of the inmate\u201d.<\/p>\n

Further, independent healthcare can provide another significant layer of independent monitoring over our closed-off prisons.<\/p>\n

Two parallel healthcare systems are not advisable. Does DCS have adequate training facilities to ensure training and updates on clinical care for clinicians on its payroll? The Judicial Inspectorate for Correctional Services (JICS), which I head, believes not. DCS clinicians often miss out on training opportunities. Further, DCS\u2019s data systems are standalone \u2013 they are not linked to the Department of Health\u2019s facilities (connecting them would ensure continuity of care when inmates are released).<\/p>\n

And a heartening thought \u2013 why not allocate community service doctors to prisons? This would alleviate costs and skills scarcity.<\/p>\n

The state of healthcare in our prisons<\/h2>\n

Grievously, our prisons are a microcosm of all our country\u2019s social ills. This is true of healthcare, but perhaps it is worse, since, notoriously, prisons are epidemiologic pumps for the spread of infectious viruses and diseases.<\/p>\n

The 2020-2021 annual report<\/a> of the Judicial Inspectorate for Correctional Services paints an agonising picture of the state of prison healthcare.<\/p>\n

Inmates do not get regular access to nurses and doctors, clinics in prisons are cramped and there is limited privacy for consultations, correctional officials are not always available to escort inmates to healthcare facilities, medications are not always dispensed on time, some medications have expired, health check-ups and screenings upon admission are not always conducted and medical files are not always updated.<\/p>\n

Healthcare professionals in prisons, especially psychologists and social workers, are working with a desperate population. In the single year covered in the report, JICS reported 86 hunger strikes, 66 attempted suicides and 27 suicides. According to DCS\u2019s annual report<\/a> \u201csuicide is the leading cause of [unnatural] deaths in correctional facilities\u201d.<\/p>\n

JICS\u2019s recent quarterly report<\/a> lists 40 unnatural deaths. We don\u2019t know the cause of most; seemingly healthy inmates died. This requires JICS\u2019s close investigative scrutiny of the post-mortem and medico-legal documents, which are in the hands of DCS and sometimes mysteriously go missing.<\/p>\n

Further, there were 113 deaths as a result of natural causes, including pneumonia, cancer, meningitis, septicaemia and asthma. Could some of these deaths have been avoided with early detection, close monitoring and regular access to medical assistance? JICS thinks so.<\/p>\n

JICS is also alarmed by the 116 declared state patients in prison; these are individuals whom the courts have found are suffering from mental unwellness challenges. As they wait indefinite periods for a transfer to a psychiatric hospital, they are wrongly housed in correctional facilities. State patients should not be a DCS responsibility. JICS has raised its voice on this: correctional facilities are not conducive for state patients, and correctional officials and fellow inmates are not trained to properly accommodate them.<\/p>\n

To end off<\/h2>\n

While inspecting prisons, I have met passionate nurses and committed doctors. Prisons are tough, dangerous and complicated places. I acknowledge that DCS has worked hard to progress in dealing with Covid, HIV and TB behind bars. But we have to do better.<\/p>\n

We need institutional reform. Healthcare professionals working in prisons ought to be independent of DCS. This means shifting all healthcare professionals to the Department of Health and ensuring proper channels of authority and oversight within prisons. In addition, healthcare professionals need specific and ongoing training for the prison environment. We also need more healthcare professionals working in prisons \u2013 and they must be accessible, proactive and willing to speak out.<\/p>\n

That takes us back to where we started. Our Department of Health must be well-resourced, well-capacitated and well-run \u2013 and healthcare professionals must be trained and supported and have job security. And this goes to the heart of whether we have a capable state, strong institutions and a culture of accountability.<\/p>\n

Judge Cameron is Inspecting Judge of Correctional Services.<\/p>\n

Views expressed are not necessarily those of GroundUp.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n

\n

\u00a9 2022 GroundUp. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License<\/a>.<\/p>\n

You may republish this article, so long as you credit the authors and GroundUp, and do not change the text. Please include a link back to the original article.<\/p>\n

We put an invisible pixel in the article so that we can count traffic to republishers. All analytics tools are solely on our servers. We do not give our logs to any third party. Logs are deleted after two weeks. We do not use any IP address identifying information except to count regional traffic. We are solely interested in counting hits, not tracking<\/b> users. If you republish, please do not delete the invisible pixel.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n

Source: GroundUp<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Healthcare professionals working in prisons should be shifted to the Department of Health, writes Judge Edwin Cameron, Inspecting Judge of Correctional Services. Graphic: Lisa Nelson Our country\u2019s healthcare system is a cumbersome double-decker bus: on top are those of us who have access of some kind to private healthcare (a high estimate is around 27% […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":227134,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","ngg_post_thumbnail":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[9928],"tags":[28001],"class_list":{"0":"post-227133","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-groundup","8":"tag-groundup","9":"entry"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/www.myza.co.za\/press\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/05\/why-independent-healthcare-inside-prisons-is-vital.jpg","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myza.co.za\/press\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/227133","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myza.co.za\/press\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myza.co.za\/press\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myza.co.za\/press\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myza.co.za\/press\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=227133"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.myza.co.za\/press\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/227133\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myza.co.za\/press\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/227134"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myza.co.za\/press\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=227133"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myza.co.za\/press\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=227133"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myza.co.za\/press\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=227133"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}