{"id":80881,"date":"2016-10-25T18:47:39","date_gmt":"2016-10-25T16:47:39","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.myza.co.za\/why-south-africas-withdrawal-is-not-a-death-knell-for-the-icc-the-conversation\/"},"modified":"2016-10-25T18:47:39","modified_gmt":"2016-10-25T16:47:39","slug":"why-south-africas-withdrawal-is-not-a-death-knell-for-the-icc-the-conversation","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.myza.co.za\/press\/why-south-africas-withdrawal-is-not-a-death-knell-for-the-icc-the-conversation\/","title":{"rendered":"Why South Africa&#8217;s withdrawal is not a death-knell for the ICC | The Conversation"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a target=\"_blank\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/theconversation.com\/why-south-africas-withdrawal-is-not-a-death-knell-for-the-icc-67470\">Why South Africa&#8217;s withdrawal is not a death-knell for the ICC<\/a>: <\/p>\n<figure><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/62e528761d0685343e1c-f3d1b99a743ffa4142d9d7f1978d9686.ssl.cf2.rackcdn.com\/files\/142926\/width496\/image-20161024-28376-o7cdma.jpg\" \/><figcaption><span class=\"caption\">South Africa&#39;s planned withdrawal from the ICC is considered a detraction from Nelson Mandela&#39;s &quot;inspiring legacy&quot;. <\/span> <span class=\"attribution\"><span class=\"source\">Jim Bourg\/Reuters<\/span><\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>This South African government has announced its intention to withdraw from the International Criminal Court (ICC). The announcement comes just over a week after Burundi said it would also start the process of withdrawing from the court. <\/p>\n<p>The establishment of the court in 2002 was greeted enthusiastically by many African countries. But in the intervening 14 years, with most of the ICC\u2019s investigations focusing on African countries, that initial enthusiasm has waned in many quarters.<\/p>\n<p>A belief has developed among a vocal group within the African Union (AU) that the ICC has disproportionately focused on Africa. The detractors say the court ignores similar, if not worse, situations in other parts of the world. Some accuse it of \u201chunting Africans\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>South Africa\u2019s withdrawal, in particular, raises new questions about the court\u2019s ongoing relevance. It comes at a time when the ICC has made important advances by opening investigations outside of Africa and completing cases that further define what is not permissible during war. <\/p>\n<h2>South Africa and the ICC<\/h2>\n<p>The catalyst for the country\u2019s withdrawal was Omar al-Bashir\u2019s presence at an AU Summit in Johannesburg in 2015. The Sudanese president is wanted by the ICC on charges of genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity. He was the first sitting head of state to be indicted.<\/p>\n<p>As a signatory to the Rome Statute that governs the jurisdiction and functioning of the court, South Africa was obliged to arrest al-Bashir and extradite him to The Hague to face trial. <\/p>\n<p>But the government refused to arrest him. It cited the impact this might have on ongoing peace negotiations in Sudan and the decision to grant immunity to all delegates attending the AU Summit. <\/p>\n<p>In March this year South Africa\u2019s Supreme Court of Appeal accused the government of \u201cdisgraceful conduct\u201d and ruled that the failure to arrest al-Bashir was unlawful. Unsurprisingly, the government remained unrepentant.<\/p>\n<p>In the case of Burundi, there is general agreement that the decision to withdraw from the court is informed purely by self-interest. President Pierre Nkurunziza\u2019s government is attempting to avoid an ICC investigation into ongoing human rights abuses since last year. But some legal scholars argue that its withdrawal will have no effect on the court\u2019s jurisdiction over the alleged crimes. <\/p>\n<p>South Africa\u2019s decision raises concerns about global justice more broadly, and more specifically the issue of immunity for heads of state. <\/p>\n<p>First, a number of human rights NGOs, among them Human Rights Watch, have decried the decision as a \u201cslap in the face for victims of the most serious crimes\u201d. According to the African Centre for Justice and Peace Studies <\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>South Africa\u2019s intended withdrawal from the ICC represents a devastating blow for victims of international crimes across Africa. <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Senegal has called on South Africa and Burundi to reconsider their decisions.<\/p>\n<p>Second, under the leadership of then President Nelson Mandela, the country played an important role in encouraging other southern African states to ratify the Rome Statute. According to renowned jurist Justice Richard Goldstone, South Africa\u2019s withdrawal detracts from Mandela\u2019s \u201cinspiring legacy\u201d. Goldstone is the former chief prosecutor of the International Criminal Tribunals for the former Yugoslavia and International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda. <\/p>\n<p>In announcing its decision, South African\u2019s Department of Justice argued that its obligations under the Rome Statute where in conflict with its obligations under customary international law. It said:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>\u2026 the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court compels South Africa to arrest persons who may enjoy diplomatic immunity under customary international law but who are wanted by the International Criminal Court [\u2026] and to surrender such persons to the International Criminal Court. We wish to give effect to the rule of customary international law which recognises the diplomatic immunity of heads of state and others in order to effectively promote dialogue and the peaceful resolution of conflicts wherever they may occur, particularly on the African continent.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>In fact South Africa adopted the Rome Statute into domestic law in 2002.<\/p>\n<h2>Immunity<\/h2>\n<p>Sovereign immunity was a well-established norm of international society for much of the modern period. But since the end of the Cold War it is a norm that has been gradually eroded through judicial decisions. An example is the Pinochet case. <\/p>\n<p>Immunity has been further eroded by new human rights norms, such as  responsibility to prevent genocide and the establishment of new international criminal justice mechanisms. These include the tribunals for Yugoslavia and Rwanda. <\/p>\n<p>Indeed, the establishment of the ICC was lauded as codification of the idea that heads of state were no longer beyond the law. Thus South Africa\u2019s decision appears to be both morally and legally regressive.  <\/p>\n<p>This year, following the embarrassment of the Kenyatta and Ruto cases, the court, through the recent convictions of Jean-Pierre Bemba Gombo and Ahmad al-Faqi al-Mahdi, made significant progress in undermining the idea of sovereign immunity (Bemba) and the extension of what is not acceptable during combat (Mahdi). <\/p>\n<p>South Africa\u2019s decision is not a death-knell to the ICC. Nonetheless these latest developments are of justifiable concern to the court. The president of the ICC\u2019s Assembly of States Parties has called on both countries to reconsider their positions. This, amid fears that<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>this disturbing signal would open the way to other African States withdrawing from the Rome Statute. <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>South Africa\u2019s withdrawal will take a year to come into effect. In the days since the withdrawal became public, the decision has been declared unconstitutional by civil society groups. They are promising a legal challenge. <\/p>\n<p>But the ongoing success, and indeed relevance, of the ICC will not be determined by legal challenges in South Africa. Rather its relevance will be determined by African states party to the court who have overcome the damaging legacy of sovereign immunity. Likewise, the voices of those who without the court would have no recourse to any form of justice will ultimately determine its existence and relevance.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/counter.theconversation.edu.au\/content\/67470\/count.gif\" alt=\"The Conversation\" width=\"1\" height=\"1\" \/> <\/p>\n<p class=\"fine-print\"><em><span>Matt Killingsworth does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond the academic appointment above.<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n<p><small><strong>Source:<\/strong> <a target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/theconversation.com\/why-south-africas-withdrawal-is-not-a-death-knell-for-the-icc-67470\">The Conversation \u2013 Articles (AFRICA)<\/a><\/small><br \/>\n<\/p>\n<p>Read more on <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/theconversation.com\" target=\"_blank\">The Conversation<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Join the fun:<\/strong> <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.myza.co.za\/add-your-event\/\">Add Your event<\/a> | <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.mypr.co.za\/submit\">Submit a Press Release<\/a> | <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.myza.co.za\/directory\/\">Add your listing<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Why South Africa&#8217;s withdrawal is not a death-knell for the ICC: South Africa&#39;s planned withdrawal from the ICC is considered a detraction from Nelson Mandela&#39;s &quot;inspiring legacy&quot;. Jim Bourg\/Reuters This South African government has announced its intention to withdraw from the International Criminal Court (ICC). The announcement comes just over a week after Burundi said [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","ngg_post_thumbnail":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[4584],"tags":[4635,8890,21126,3576,21031],"class_list":{"0":"post-80881","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-africa-news-2","7":"tag-africas","8":"tag-conversation","9":"tag-deathknell","10":"tag-south","11":"tag-withdrawal","12":"entry"},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myza.co.za\/press\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/80881","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myza.co.za\/press\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myza.co.za\/press\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myza.co.za\/press\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myza.co.za\/press\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=80881"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.myza.co.za\/press\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/80881\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.myza.co.za\/press\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=80881"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myza.co.za\/press\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=80881"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.myza.co.za\/press\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=80881"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}